{"id":110169,"date":"2018-08-17T23:18:03","date_gmt":"2018-08-17T23:18:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/?p=110169"},"modified":"2022-02-07T12:47:31","modified_gmt":"2022-02-07T12:47:31","slug":"why-jeremy-corbyn-must-not-seek-to-appease-the-racist-zionist-state-by-jonathan-cook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/2018\/08\/17\/why-jeremy-corbyn-must-not-seek-to-appease-the-racist-zionist-state-by-jonathan-cook\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Jeremy Corbyn must not seek to appease the racist Zionist state – By Jonathan Cook"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Jonathan Cook <\/a><\/em><\/h5>\n

The Labour Party, relentlessly battered by an organised campaign of smears of its leader, Jeremy Corbyn \u2013 first for being anti-Semitic, and now for honouring Palestinian terrorists \u2013 is reportedly about to adopt the four additional working \u201cexamples\u201d of anti-Semitism drafted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).Labour initially rejected these examples \u2013 stoking yet more condemnation from Israel\u2019s lobbyists and the British corporate media \u2013 because it justifiably feared, as have prominent legal experts<\/a>, that accepting them would severely curb the freedom to criticise Israel.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Jeremy Corbyn<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The media\u2019s ever-more outlandish slurs against Corbyn and the Labour Party\u2019s imminent capitulation on the IHRA\u2019s full definition of anti-Semitism are not unrelated events. The former was designed to bring about the latter.<\/p>\n

According to a report<\/a> in the Guardian<\/i> this week, senior party figures are agitating for the rapid adoption of the full IHRA definition, ideally before the party conference next month, and say Corbyn has effectively surrendered to the pressure. An MP who supports Corbyn told the paper Corbyn would \u201cjust have to take one for the team\u201d.<\/p>\n

In a strong indication of the way the wind is now blowing, the Guardian<\/i> added:<\/p>\n

The party said it would consult the main [Jewish] communal bodies as well as experts and academics, but groups such as the pro-Corbyn Jewish Voice for Labour have not been asked to give their views.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

No stomach for battle<\/h3>\n

The full adoption of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism will be a major victory both for Israel and its apologists in Britain, who who have been seeking to silence all meaningful criticism of Israel, and for the British corporate media, which would dearly love to see the back of an old-school socialist Labour leader whose programme threatens to loosen the 40-year stranglehold of neoliberalism on British society.<\/p>\n

\n

\u2026 Corbyn himself has conceded too much ground on anti-Semitism\u2026 He has tried to placate rather than defy the smearers. He has tried to maintain unity with people who have no interest in finding common ground with him.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Besieged for four years, Corbyn\u2019s allies in the Labour leadership have largely lost the stomach for battle, one that was never about substance or policy but about character assassination. As the stakes have been constantly upped by the media and the Blairite holdouts in the party bureaucracy, the inevitable has happened. Corbyn has been abandoned. Few respected politicians with career ambitions or a public profile want to risk being cast out into the wilderness, like Ken Livingstone, as an anti-Semite.<\/p>\n

This is why the supposed anti-Semitism \u201ccrisis\u201d in a Corbyn-led Labour Party has been so much more effective than berating him for his clothes or his patriotism. Natural selection \u2013 survival of the smear fittest for the job \u2013 meant that a weaponised anti-Semitism would eventually identify Corbyn as its prime target and not just his supporters \u2013 especially after his unexpectedly strong showing at the polls in last year\u2019s election.<\/p>\n

Worse, Corbyn himself has conceded too much ground on anti-Semitism. As a lifelong anti-racism campaigner, the accusations of anti-Semitism have clearly pained him. He has tried to placate rather than defy the smearers. He has tried to maintain unity with people who have no interest in finding common ground with him.<\/p>\n

And as he has lost all sense of how to respond in good faith to allegations made in bad faith, he has begun committing the cardinal sin of sounding and looking evasive \u2013 just as those who deployed the anti-Semitism charge hoped. It was his honesty, plain-speaking and compassion that won him the leadership and the love of ordinary members. Unless he can regain the political and spiritual confidence that underpinned those qualities, he risks haemorrhaging support.<\/p>\n

Critical juncture<\/h3>\n

But beyond Corbyn\u2019s personal fate, the Labour Party has now reached a critical juncture in its response to the smear campaign. In adopting the full IHRA definition, the party will jettison the principle of free speech and curtail critical debate about an entire country, Israel \u2013 as well as a key foreign policy issue for those concerned about the direction the Middle East is taking.<\/p>\n

Discussion of what kind of state Israel is, what its policy goals are, and whether they are compatible with a peace process are about to be taken off the table by Britain\u2019s largest, supposedly progressive party.<\/p>\n

That thought spurred me to cast an eye over my back-catalogue of journalism. I have been based in Nazareth, in Israel\u2019s Galilee, since 2001. In that time I have written \u2013 according to my website<\/a> \u2013 more than 900 articles (plus another few hundred blog posts) on Israel, as well as three peer-reviewed books and a clutch of chapters in edited collections. That\u2019s a lot of writing. Many more than a million words about Israel over nearly two decades.<\/p>\n

\n

After 17 years of writing about Israel, after winning a respected journalism prize for being \u201cone of the reliable truth-tellers in the Middle East\u201d, the Labour Party is about to declare that I, and many others like me, are irredeemable anti-Semites.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

What shocked me, however, as I started to pore over these articles was that almost all of them \u2013 except for a handful dealing with internal Palestinian politics \u2013 would fall foul of at least one of these four additional IHRA examples Labour is about to adopt.<\/p>\n

After 17 years of writing about Israel, after winning a respected journalism prize for being \u201cone of the reliable truth-tellers in the Middle East\u201d, the Labour Party is about to declare that I, and many others like me, are irredeemable anti-Semites.<\/p>\n

Not that I am unused to such slurs. I am intimately familiar with a community of online stalkers who happily throw around the insults \u201cNazi\u201d and \u201canti-Semite\u201d at anyone who doesn\u2019t cheerlead the settlements of the Greater Israel project. But far more troubling is that this will be my designation not by bullying Israel partisans but by the official party of the British left.<\/p>\n

Of course, I will not be alone. Much of my journalism has been about documenting and reporting the careful work of scholars, human rights groups, lawyers and civil society organisations \u2013 Palestinian, Israeli and international alike \u2013 that have charted the structural racism in Israel\u2019s legal and administrative system, explaining often in exasperating detail its ethnocractic character and its apartheid policies. All of us are going to be effectively cast out, denied any chance to inform or contribute to the debates and policies of Britain\u2019s only leftwing party with a credible shot at power.<\/p>\n

That is a shocking realisation. The Labour Party is about to slam the door shut in the faces of the Palestinian people, as well as progressive Jews and others who stand in solidarity with them.<\/p>\n

Betrayal of Palestinians<\/h3>\n

The article in the Guardian<\/i>, the newspaper that has done more to damage Corbyn than any other (by undermining him from within his own camp), described the incorporation of the full IHRA anti-Semitism definition into Labour\u2019s code of conduct as a \u201ccompromise\u201d, as though the betrayal of an oppressed people was something over which middle ground could be found.<\/p>\n

Remember that the man who drafted the IHRA definition and its associated examples, American Jewish lawyer Kenneth Stern, has publicly regretted<\/a> their impact, saying that in practice they have severely curbed freedom of speech about Israel.<\/p>\n

How these new examples will be misused by Corbyn\u2019s opponents should already be clear. He made his most egregious mistake in the handling of the party\u2019s supposed anti-Semitism \u201ccrisis\u201d precisely to avoid getting caught up in a violation of one of the IHRA examples Labour is about to adopt: comparing Israel to Nazi Germany.<\/p>\n

He apologised for attending an anti-racism event and distanced himself from a friend, the late Hajo Meyer, a holocaust survivor and defender of Palestinian rights, who used his speech to compare Israel\u2019s current treatment of Palestinians to early Nazi laws that vilified and oppressed Jews.<\/p>\n

It was a Judas-like act for which it is not necessary to berate Corbyn. He is doubtless already torturing himself over what he did. But that is the point: the adoption of the full IHRA definition will demand the constant vilification and rooting out of progressive and humane voices like Meyer\u2019s. It will turn the Labour Party into the modern equivalent of Senator Joe McCarthy\u2019s House of Un-American Activities Committee. Labour activists will find themselves, like Corbyn, either outed or required to out others as supposed anti-Semites. They will have to denounce reasonable criticisms of Israel and dissociate themselves from supporters of the Palestinian cause, even holocaust survivors.<\/p>\n

The patent absurdity of Labour including this new anti-Semitism \u201cexample\u201d should be obvious the moment we consider that it will recast not only Meyer and other holocaust survivors as anti-Semites but leading Jewish intellectuals and scholars \u2013 even Israeli army generals.<\/p>\n

Two years ago Yair Golan, the deputy chief of staff of the Israeli military, went public with such a comparison. Addressing an audience in Israel on Holocaust Day, he spoke<\/a> of where Israel was heading:<\/p>\n

If there\u2019s something that frightens me about holocaust remembrance it\u2019s the recognition of the revolting processes that occurred in Europe in general, and particularly in Germany, back then \u2013 70, 80 and 90 years ago \u2013 and finding signs of them here among us today in 2016.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Is it not a paradox that, were Golan a member of the Labour Party, that statement \u2013 a rare moment of self-reflection by a senior Israeli figure \u2013 will soon justify his being vilified and hounded out of the Labour Party?<\/p>\n

Evidence of Israeli apartheid<\/h3>\n

Looking at my own work, it is clear that almost all of it falls foul of two further \u201cexamples\u201d of anti-Semitism cited in the full IHRA definition that Labour is preparing to adopt:<\/p>\n

\u201cApplying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation,\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

and:<\/p>\n

\u201cDenying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

One hardly needs to point out how preposterous it is that the Labour Party is about to outlaw from internal discussion or review any research, scholarship or journalism that violates these two \u201cexamples\u201d weeks after Israel passed its Nation-State Basic Law. That law, which has constitutional weight, makes explicit what was always implicit in Israel as a Jewish state:<\/p>\n

1. that Israel privileges the rights and status of Jews around the world, including those who have never even visited Israel, above the rights of the fifth of the country\u2019s citizens who are non-Jews (the remnants of the native Palestinian population who survived the ethnic cleansing campaign of 1948).<\/p>\n

2. that Israel, as defined in the Basic Law, is not a state bounded by internationally recognised borders but rather the \u201cLand of Israel\u201d \u2013 a Biblical conception of Israel whose borders encompass the occupied Palestinian territories and parts of many neighbouring states.<\/p>\n

How, one might reasonably wonder, is such a state \u2013 defined this way in the Basic Law \u2013 a normal \u201cdemocratic\u201d state? How is it not structurally racist and inherently acquisitive of other people\u2019s territory?<\/p>\n

Contrary to the demands of these two extra IHRA \u201cexamples\u201d, the Basic Law alone shows that Israel is a \u201cracist endeavour\u201d and that we cannot judge it by the same standards we would a normal Western-style democracy. Not least, it has a double \u201cborder\u201d problem: it forces Jews everywhere to be included in its self-definition of the \u201cnation\u201d, whether they want to be or not; and it lays claim to the title deeds of other territories without any intention to confer on their non-Jewish inhabitants the rights it accords Jews.<\/p>\n

Demanding that we treat Israel as a normal Western-style liberal democracy \u2013 as the IHRA full definition requires \u2013 makes as much sense as having demanded the same for apartheid South Africa back in the 1980s.<\/p>\n

Unaccountable politics<\/h3>\n

The Labour Party has become the largest in Europe as Corbyn has attracted huge numbers of newcomers into the membership, inspired by a new kind of politics. That is a terrifying development for the old politics, which preferred tiny political cliques accountable chiefly to corporate donors, leaving a slightly wider circle of activists largely powerless.<\/p>\n

That is why the Blairite holdouts in the party bureaucracy are quite content to use any pretext not only to root out genuine progressive activists drawn to a Corbyn-led party, including anti-Zionist Jewish activists<\/a>, but to alienate tens of thousands more members that had begun to transform Labour into a grassroots movement.<\/p>\n

A party endlessly obsessing about anti-Semitism, a party that has abandoned the Palestinians, a party that has begun throwing out key progressive principles, a party that has renounced free speech, and a party that no longer puts the interests of the poor and vulnerable at the centre of its concerns is a party that will fail.<\/p>\n

That is where the anti-Semitism \u201ccrisis\u201d is leading Labour \u2013 precisely as it was designed to do.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Jonathan Cook The Labour Party, relentlessly battered by an organised campaign of smears of its leader, Jeremy Corbyn \u2013 first for being anti-Semitic, and now for honouring Palestinian terrorists \u2013 is reportedly about to adopt the four additional working \u201cexamples\u201d of anti-Semitism drafted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).Labour initially rejected these examples […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[19],"class_list":["post-110169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorised","tag-english"],"translation":{"provider":"WPGlobus","version":"2.12.2","language":"es","enabled_languages":["gb","es","fr","pt","ru","no","ar"],"languages":{"gb":{"title":true,"content":true,"excerpt":false},"es":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"fr":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"pt":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"ru":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"no":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false},"ar":{"title":false,"content":false,"excerpt":false}}},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110169"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110169"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":110323,"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110169\/revisions\/110323"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footballagainstapartheid.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}